ELEMENT STEWARDSHIP ABSTRACT

for

Epioblasma torulosa rangiana - northern riffleshell

To the User:

Element Stewardship Abstracts (ESAs) are prepared to provide The Nature Conservancy's Stewardship staff and other land managers with current management related information on those species and communities that are most important to protect, or most important to control. The abstracts organize and summarize data from numerous sources including literature and researchers and managers actively working with the species or community.

We hope, by providing this abstract free of charge, to encourage users to contribute their information to the abstract. This sharing of information will benefit all land managers by ensuring the availability of an abstract that contains up-to-date information on management techniques and knowledgeable contacts. Contributors of information will be acknowledged within the abstract and receive updated editions.

For ease of update and retrievability, the abstracts are stored on computer at the national office of The Nature Conservancy. Each abstract has a Nature Conservancy office or program responsible for its updating and maintenance. The address and telephone number of the office is recorded on the last page of the abstract. Anyone with comments, questions, or information on current or past monitoring, research, or management programs for the species or community described in an abstract should contact the Land Steward in the office responsible for that abstract.

The sources from which the information in the abstract comes are dependant upon the research and observations of many scientists and individuals. In most cases, this information is not the result of comprehensive site-specific field surveys, and may not be confirmed by Nature Conservancy staff. Many areas of the United States have never been thoroughly surveyed, and new plants and animals are still being discovered. Information in this abstract should never be regarded as a final statement or substituted for on-site surveys required for environmental assessments. Views expressed in the abstract are those of the author and not of The Nature Conservancy. They represent the best assessment of the author in light of the information available.

The information in this abstract is only for the intended use of the individual or organization who requested it. It may not be distributed in any way without the consent of The Nature Conservancy. Please contact the Home Office Stewardship Administrator if you want to disseminate such information.

Please do not remove this cover statement from the attached abstract.

(01995

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY

1815 North Lynn Street, Arlington, Virginia 22209 (703) 841-5300

The Nature Conservancy

Element Stewardship Abstract

For EPIOBLASMA TORULOSA RANGIANA

1. IDENTIFIERS

Common Name: NORTHERN RIFFLESHELL

General Description:

Global Rank: G2T2

SHELL: Subquadrate or triangular in outline, very inequilateral, inflated and solid. The anterior end is rounded. The posterior end of the male is somewhat bluntly pointed above, sloping and truncated below; in the female it is inflated in the "brood pouch" region. The ventral margin of males is broadly curved, sinuate in the posterior fourth; it is almost straight in the females except for the expanded region of the brood pouch. The posterior ridge of the male is doubled, rather low and faint. The posterior ridge in female specimens is also doubled, but somewhat obscured by a sharp sulcus before the brood pouch swelling. Beaks are elevated, prominent, located in the anterior fourth. Beak sculpture consists of a few faint corrugations, sometimes broken or occasionally double-looped; the beaks often show signs of abrasion against each other. The surface is interrupted with numerous strong growth rest lines. The epidermis is smooth and shiny, yellowish-green, yellow, brownish, or rarely salmon, usually with numerous fine, faint, wavy green rays. The shell often has a satin-like epidermis when young, but with age it becomes brownish and the rays become obscured. The left valve has two subtriangular, ragged, elevated pseudocardinal teeth, a narrow interdenturn and two short, straight lateral teeth. The right valve has one, sometimes three pseudocardinal teeth, and one larger triangular tooth with a smaller tooth before and behind it. There is one short lateral tooth, often with a vestigial tooth below it. Beak cavities are rather shallow and open. The muscle scars and pallial line are impressed. The nacre is white, rarely salmon.

It is seldom buried to the posterior margin of the shell. The white mantle linings of the female are easily seen.

ANIMAL (from Ortmann, 1912, p 354): "Inner laminae of inner gills entirely connected with abdominal sac. In the female, the inner edge of the mantle in front of the branchial is not parallel to the outer edge, but is more or less remote from it, often quite distant, and it has finer or coarser papillae. Toward the middle of the lower margin, the two edges again approach each other, and are normal farther forward. The mantle between the two edges is peculiarly spongy. Thus, an inner compartment is formed in front of the branchial opening. In the male, the two edges of the mantle do not have this structure, or it is only merely indicated. Brood pouch swollen, kidney-shaped, formed by many ovisacs, occupying the posterior section of the outer gill. Edge of brood pouch blunt, beaded, but not pigmented." EPIOBLASMA RANGIANA has been illustrated by Johnson (1978) and Clarke (1981).

I

Element Occurrence (EO) Specifications:

An area of suitable natural habitat where evidence indicates an extant or historical population. EO Quality us based upon the density and reproduction potential as well as habitat suitability and size. EO Condition relates to water and substrate quality (e.g., siltation, dredging) and to overall riverine community health, especially host fish populations.

EO Rank Specifications:

"A" Rank:

10- 15+ contiguous miles of small to medium size and free-flowing river with regularly occurring areas of riffles and runs supporting dense population centers for element. Water quality should be at least moderate and without recent chronic deterioration due to increasing threats, and water quality should be consistent along this length. River should be at least somewhat defensible and land use in watershed should include largely manageable threats. In general, populations of other mussel species and fishes are high, indicating quality of habitat and environment. Glass-bottom bucket, snorkel and noodling surveys in the best habitat should produce 6-8+ live individuals/survey hour by experienced person. (Will be higher in easily surveyed substrates and water depths.) Where muskrat predation on mussels in general is high (large middens of dozens to hundreds of shells), element's proportion of muskrat shell middens is regularly 5+%, or 20-30+ fresh to slightly weathered shells can be found per 50 meters of habitat (can be 2-4 times this number). At least occasional juveniles/ sub-adults are regularly discovered, especiallt in muskrat middens.

"B" Rank:

Shorter sections of river (6-9 miles) supporting some relatively high population centers, or long river segments with lower densities. EO quality and condition are lower due to lower quantity of quality habitat or degradation of potential habitat. However, portions of habitat that are degraded show potential for recovery. Surveys reveal 3-5 live individuals/experienced person hour and/or 14% of middens, or 10-19 fresh to slightly weathered shells/50m of habitat.

"C" Rank:

Limited stretch of river (1 -5 mi) supporting low to moderate density population (or longer habitat distance with only low numbers), where good quality habitat does not exist or is limited, or additional potential habitat has been destroyed. Surrounding land use has damaged water and habitat quality and includes threats that are difficult to manage. Surveys reveal 1-2 live individuals/2-3 surveys hours by experienced person; occasionally fresh shells regularly found in muskrat middens or along stream (<I%), including at least some indication of reproduction and recruitment.

"D" Rank:

Short (<I mi) stretch of suitable and/or occupied habitat with a low population; or, a longer river segment but supporting very low numbers. Habitat is scarce, or has been degraded by active threats. Surveys reveal only I or 2 per day of survey work, or a number of surveys produce at least some evidence of extant occurence; shells are rarely ever found in muskrat middens. EO appears to be reproducing little or not at all, i.e., essentially all individuals are old adults. 11. STEWARDSHIP SUMMARY

Refer to the General Freshwater Mussel ESA.

111. NATURAL HISTORY

Range:

This entity replaces E. TORULOSA in the headwaters of the Ohio River drainage; its counterpart in the headwaters of the Tennessee River System is E. TORULOSA GUBERNACULUM. As with most naiads, its present range is a remnant of its former distribution. Historically, this entity was recorded from the mainstern of the Ohio River (Stansbery and Cooney, 1985) but has apparently been extirpated from there. The Ohio State University Museum of Zoology has records for the White and Wabash Rivers in Indiana but it has not been collected there in recent times (Clark, 1976; Abrell, pers. comm.). Taylor and Hughart (198 1) presumed that it was no longer present in the Elk River of West Virginia. Despite such range reductions, there still exist sporadic, presumably healthy populations.

Preferred habitat in Big Darby Creek, Ohio is still inhabited (Walters, pers. obs.).

Habitat:

Ortmann (1919, p 334) reported that this species was "always found ... on riffles, on a bottom of firmly packed and rather fine gravel, in swiftly flowing, shallow water or coarse gravel" and Clarke (1981, p 362) gave its habitat as "highly oxygenated riffle. Preferred habitat appears to require swiftly moving water. The high oxygen concentrations in swift streams may be necessary for survival. It is a species of riffle areas of smaller streams, and as such has fared better than larger river species, which have been heavily impacted by dredging and impoundment. Of the eleven or so species of naiads thought to be extinct in 1971 by Stansbery, most were from this latter type of habitat and all were species of EPIOBLASMA.

Reproduction:

Ortmann (1912, p 3 5 8) reported RANGIANA to be gravid in September and Clarke (198 1, p 352) said it was a "longterm breeder, gravid from late summer to following spring". The female uses the posterior portion of the outer gill as marsupia. It is widely believed that the "brood pouch" swellings of the female shell are caused by the expanded gravid gills, but Stansbery (pers. comm.) and Hoggarth (pers. comm.) do not believe this to be the case.

The host fish is unknown. However, Hill (1986) identified the following fish as possible hosts for the closely related E. CAPSAEFORMIS: spotted darter, redline darter, dusky darter, and the banded sculpin.

Based upon counts of annular growth lines, this species may reach 15+ years of age. It is not known at what ages reproductive maturity begins and ends. Because of the rarity of live material (and their enforced protection), it is not known if existing populations are reproductively active. Because of their small size, it is not known if juveniles are present in any of the populations. It must be emphasized that existing populations may be large, healthy, and reproductively active and still be in imminent danger of extinction if the host fish is not present in the range.

IV. CONDITION

Threats:

EPIOBLASMA seems to be particularly sensitive to impoundment; most species are riffle/run inhabitants and cannot tolerate other habitats. Impoundment by the Norris Reservoir of the Clinch River in Tennessee has resulted in the extirpation of the majority of species below the dam (Ahlstedt, 1984). The construction of the Wilson Dam on the Tennessee River has eliminated 20 of the original 22 Cumberlandian naiad species (Stansbery, 1971).

The existing populations are predominately in agricultural areas impacted by the runoff of pesticides and fertilizers. EPIOBLASMA RANGIANA is banned from export (1977).

Refer to the General Freshwater Mussel ESA.

Restoration Potential:

Although extirpated from much of its original range, several apparently healthy populations still exist. These populations should be carefully monitored to ensure that the existing condition of the habitat does not deteriorate.

V. MANAGEMENT/MONITORING

Preserve Selection & Design Considerations:

Refer to the General Freshwater Mussel ESA.

Management Requirements:

Refer to the General Freshwater Mussel ESA.

Management Programs:

The land in and immediately adjacent to The Nature Conservancy's Commercial Point tract on Big Darby Creek in Ohio supports one population (possibly the largest one remaining). The extent and age structure of the population should be investigated to determine the quality of the occurrence. Such a survey was planned by The Nature Conservancy in Ohio in July-September, 1986. A second potential population exists in Fish Creek, and possibly other tributaries of the St. Joseph River. This system was scheduled to be surveyed by The Ohio Department of Natural Resources in September-October, 1986.

Monitoring Requirements:

Refer to the General Freshwater Mussel ESA.

Monitoring Programs:

There are no known monitoring programs for this species. Refer to the General Freshwater Mussel ESA for information on monitoring of other species.

VI. RESEARCH

Management Research Programs:

Michael A. Hoggarth (Museum of Zoology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1394) has conducted research on the determination of naiad fish hosts by glochidial identification.

Management Research Needs:

Refer to the General Freshwater Mussel ESA.

VIL INFORMATION SOURCES

Bibliography:

Ahlstedt, Steven Albin. 1984. Twentieth century changes in the freshwater mussel fauna of the Clinch River (Tennessee a nd Virginia). The University of Tennessee. 102pp.

Clark, C. F. 1976. The freshwater naiads of the lower end of the Wabash River, Mt. Carmel, Illinois to the South. Sterkiana (61):1-14.

Clarke, A. H. 1981. The freshwater mollusks of Canada. Natio nal Museum of Natural Sciences. 446 pp.

D. B. Abrell. Indiana Department of Natural Resources. Personal communication.

Hill, D.M. 1986. Cumberlandian mollusk conservation program, activity 3: identification of fish hosts. Office of Natural Resources and Econ. Development, TN Valley Authority, Norris, TN. 55pp.

Hoggarth, M. A. 1985. Museum of Zoology, Ohio State University. Personal communication.

Johnson, R.I. 1978. Systematics and zoogeography of Plagiola (=Dysomia--Epioblasma), an almost extinct genus of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia:Unionidae) from middle N. America. Bull. Mus. of Comparative Zool., Cambridge, MA. 148(6):239-320.

Ortmann, A.E. 1912. Notes upon the families and genera of the najades. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 8(2):222-365.

Ortmann, A.E. 1919. Monograph of the naiades of Pennsylvania. Part III. Systematic account of the genus and species. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum 8(l). 385 pp.

Stansbery, D. H. 1971. Rare and endangered freshwater mollusks in eastern United States. Pages 5-18 in S. E. Jorgensen, and R. W. Sharp. Proc. Symp. Rare and Endangered mollusks (naiads) of the U.S. U.S. Department of the Interior. 79 pp.

Stansbery, D. H. Museum of Zoology, Ohio State University. Personal communication.

Stansbery, D. H., and J. D. Cooney. 1985. Survey of the unionid mollusks of the Ohio River in the vicinity of the William H. Zimmer Station (Ohio River miles 442.6 to 445.6). Final Report submitted to Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company, Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company, Dayton Power and Light Company. 33 pp.

Stansbery, David H. 1970. Eastern freshwater mollusks (1): The Mississippi and St. Lawrence River systems. Malacologia. 10(l):9-22.

Taylor, R. W., and R. C. Hugart. 198 1. The freshwater naiads of Elk River, West Virginia, with a comparison of earlier collections. Nautilus 95(l):21-5.

 

VIII. DOCUMENT PREPARATION & MAINTENANCE

Edition Date: 1986-08-01

Edition Author: Watters, G. Thomas